IMTM vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap
IMTMiShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 313 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
PAVEGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Global X · 100 holdings · $14.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (IMTM: 2026-04-30, PAVE: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IMTM and PAVE?
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM, by iShares) holds 313 positions; Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE, by Global X) holds 100. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0IMTM holds 313 · PAVE holds 100
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IMTM 0%·PAVE 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IMTM
313 of 313 positions (99.4% of the fund) are not held by PAVE. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in PAVE
100 of 100 positions (99.9% of the fund) are not held by IMTM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IMTM | PAVE |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 20.2% | 75.1% |
| Financials | 36.0% | 0.0% |
| Materials | 8.4% | 20.3% |
| Information Technology | 10.0% | 1.1% |
| Utilities | 5.1% | 3.1% |
| Other Sectors | 15.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 4.6% | 0.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of IMTM, 0% of PAVE).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | +2.7% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +21.3% | +10.1% | +10.4% | 4.34% |
| PAVE | +4.0% | +23.0% | +29.9% | +22.7% | +18.1% | — | 0.73% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IMTM vs PAVE →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IMTM and PAVE overlap?
IMTM and PAVE overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (IMTM holds 313 positions and PAVE holds 100), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IMTM and PAVE?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does IMTM own that PAVE doesn't?
313 positions (99.4% of IMTM) are unique to IMTM, led by ASML, HSBA and SAN. In the other direction, 100 positions (99.9% of PAVE) are unique to PAVE.