IOO vs SCHF: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 110 holdings · $9.3B · as of 2026-03-31
SCHFSchwab International Equity ETF
Schwab · 1476 holdings · $67.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IOO: 2026-03-31, SCHF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IOO and SCHF?
iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO, by iShares) holds 110 positions; Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF, by Schwab) holds 1476. They have 50 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 19.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 19.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 50IOO holds 110 · SCHF holds 1476
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IOO 20%·SCHF 25%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IOO
60 of 110 positions (80.1% of the fund) are not held by SCHF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IOO | SCHF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 42.3% | 15.5% |
| Financials | 10.0% | 21.7% |
| Industrials | 5.0% | 14.5% |
| Communication Services | 10.1% | 2.9% |
| Health Care | 9.8% | 7.1% |
| Other Sectors | 22.5% | 26.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 11.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IOO, 12% of SCHF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOO | +5.6% | +16.0% | +31.2% | +25.4% | +16.4% | +16.6% | 0.80% |
| SCHF | +2.7% | +18.1% | +30.6% | +20.0% | +10.5% | +10.4% | 2.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IOO vs SCHF →
Shared Holdings(50)
The top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the overlap, led by 005930, ASML and AZN.
1.66% | 3.32% | 1.66% | |
1.48% | 2.10% | 1.48% | |
0.87% | 0.93% | 0.87% | |
0.84% | 0.97% | 0.84% | |
0.81% | 1.08% | 0.81% | |
0.80% | 0.99% | 0.80% | |
0.75% | 0.80% | 0.75% | |
0.72% | 0.88% | 0.72% | |
0.70% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.58% | 0.69% | 0.58% | |
0.53% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.52% | 0.74% | 0.52% | |
0.51% | 0.77% | 0.51% | |
0.50% | 0.62% | 0.50% | |
0.48% | 0.61% | 0.48% | |
0.46% | 0.57% | 0.46% | |
0.42% | 0.57% | 0.42% | |
0.40% | 0.47% | 0.40% | |
0.37% | 0.39% | 0.37% | |
0.37% | 0.44% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.56% | 0.36% | |
0.36% | 0.45% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.37% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 0.41% | 0.34% | |
0.34% | 0.50% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IOO and SCHF overlap?
IOO and SCHF overlap by 19.6% of portfolio weight. They share 50 holdings (IOO holds 110 positions and SCHF holds 1476), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IOO and SCHF?
The two portfolios are 19.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IOO and SCHF?
The largest positions held by both funds are 005930, ASML, AZN, NOVN and HSBA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the total overlap.
What does IOO own that SCHF doesn't?
60 positions (80.1% of IOO) are unique to IOO, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 1426 positions (74.0% of SCHF) are unique to SCHF.