IPAC vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (IPAC: 2026-04-30, KOMP: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IPAC and KOMP?
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 4 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 4IPAC holds 1375 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IPAC 1%·KOMP 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IPAC
1371 of 1375 positions (98.7% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in KOMP
497 of 501 positions (99.5% of the fund) are not held by IPAC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IPAC | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 9.0% | 29.9% |
| Industrials | 15.3% | 27.4% |
| Financials | 20.1% | 1.8% |
| Health Care | 4.1% | 12.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.5% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 21.1% | 9.7% |
| Unclassified | 22.2% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (22% of IPAC, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IPAC vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(4)
The top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by GRAB, SE and FUTU.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IPAC and KOMP overlap?
IPAC and KOMP overlap by 0.2% of portfolio weight. They share 4 holdings (IPAC holds 1375 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IPAC and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 0.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IPAC and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are GRAB, SE, FUTU and BTDR. Together the top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does IPAC own that KOMP doesn't?
1371 positions (98.7% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC, led by CBA, 8306 and BHP. In the other direction, 497 positions (99.5% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.