IPAC vs SCHC: Holdings Overlap
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
SCHCSchwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Schwab · 2230 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (IPAC: 2026-04-30, SCHC: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IPAC and SCHC?
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375 positions; Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC, by Schwab) holds 2230. They have 650 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 650IPAC holds 1375 · SCHC holds 2230
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IPAC 7%·SCHC 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IPAC
725 of 1375 positions (92.7% of the fund) are not held by SCHC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
| SCHC | +4.9% | +11.6% | +20.4% | +17.4% | +6.7% | +8.3% | 3.32% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IPAC vs SCHC →
Shared Holdings(650)
The top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the overlap, led by PRU, GGP and 3110.
0.06% | 0.19% | 0.06% | |
0.05% | 0.18% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.16% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 0.17% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.12% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.12% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.13% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.12% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.14% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.12% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.15% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.12% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.13% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 0.11% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.12% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.07% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.11% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.13% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.09% | 0.03% |
Showing the top 250 of 650 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IPAC and SCHC overlap?
IPAC and SCHC overlap by 6.5% of portfolio weight. They share 650 holdings (IPAC holds 1375 positions and SCHC holds 2230), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IPAC and SCHC?
The two portfolios are 6.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IPAC and SCHC?
The largest positions held by both funds are PRU, GGP, 3110, 6787 and RRL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the total overlap.
What does IPAC own that SCHC doesn't?
725 positions (92.7% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC, led by CBA, 8306 and BHP. In the other direction, 1580 positions (76.5% of SCHC) are unique to SCHC.