IPAC vs SCHF: Holdings Overlap
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
SCHFSchwab International Equity ETF
Schwab · 1476 holdings · $67.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (IPAC: 2026-04-30, SCHF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IPAC and SCHF?
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375 positions; Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF, by Schwab) holds 1476. They have 667 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 28.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 28.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 667IPAC holds 1375 · SCHF holds 1476
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IPAC 91%·SCHF 29%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IPAC
708 of 1375 positions (7.8% of the fund) are not held by SCHF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IPAC | SCHF |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 20.1% | 21.7% |
| Information Technology | 9.0% | 15.5% |
| Industrials | 15.3% | 14.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.5% | 5.7% |
| Health Care | 4.1% | 7.1% |
| Other Sectors | 21.1% | 23.3% |
| Unclassified | 22.2% | 11.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (22% of IPAC, 12% of SCHF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
| SCHF | +2.7% | +18.1% | +30.6% | +20.0% | +10.5% | +10.4% | 2.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IPAC vs SCHF →
Shared Holdings(667)
The top 10 shared positions account for 20% of the overlap, led by BHP, 8306 and 7203.
 BHPBHP Group Ltd. | 2.19% | 0.74% | 0.74% |
|---|---|---|---|
 8306Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. NPV | 2.21% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
 7203Toyota Motor Corp. NPV | 1.98% | 0.68% | 0.68% |
 CBACommonwealth Bank of Australia | 2.30% | 0.66% | 0.66% |
 9984SoftBank Group Corp. | 1.38% | 0.62% | 0.62% |
 8035Tokyo Electron Ltd. NPV | 1.44% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
 6501Hitachi Ltd. NPV | 1.59% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
 8316Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc. NPV | 1.41% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
 6758Sony Group Corp. NPV | 1.34% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
 6857Advantest Corp. NPV | 1.56% | 0.40% | 0.40% |
 1299AIA Group Ltd. | 1.25% | 0.37% | 0.37% |
 8411Mizuho Financial Group Inc. NPV | 1.17% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
 8058Mitsubishi Corp. NPV | 1.12% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
 DBSDBS Group Holdings Ltd. | 1.05% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
 6981Murata Manufacturing Co Ltd. NPV | 0.60% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
 6861Keyence Corp. NPV | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
 9983Fast Retailing Co Ltd. NPV | 0.98% | 0.31% | 0.31% |
 4063Shin-Etsu Chemical Co Ltd. NPV | 0.85% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
 WBCWestpac Banking Corp. | 1.04% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
 6098Recruit Holdings Co Ltd. NPV | 0.71% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
 8031Mitsui & Co Ltd. NPV | 1.01% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
 NABNational Australia Bank Ltd. | 0.97% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
 6503Mitsubishi Electric Corp. NPV | 0.83% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
 8766Tokio Marine Holdings Inc. NPV | 0.92% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
 ANZANZ Group Holdings Ltd. | 0.87% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
Showing the top 250 of 667 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IPAC and SCHF overlap?
IPAC and SCHF overlap by 28.8% of portfolio weight. They share 667 holdings (IPAC holds 1375 positions and SCHF holds 1476), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IPAC and SCHF?
The two portfolios are 28.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IPAC and SCHF?
The largest positions held by both funds are BHP, 8306, 7203, CBA and 9984. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 20% of the total overlap.
What does IPAC own that SCHF doesn't?
708 positions (7.8% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC, led by SE, GRAB and FUTU. In the other direction, 809 positions (70.5% of SCHF) are unique to SCHF.