ITB vs SLYG: Holdings Overlap
ITBiShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
iShares · 46 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-03-31
SLYGState Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Growth ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 349 holdings · $5.3B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (ITB: 2026-03-31, SLYG: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ITB and SLYG?
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB, by iShares) holds 46 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 349. They have 6 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 6ITB holds 46 · SLYG holds 349
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ITB 8%·SLYG 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ITB
40 of 46 positions (92.2% of the fund) are not held by SLYG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in SLYG
343 of 349 positions (97.8% of the fund) are not held by ITB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ITB | SLYG |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 73.0% | 12.0% |
| Industrials | 20.8% | 21.9% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.7% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 15.0% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 13.8% |
| Other Sectors | 6.0% | 20.6% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 0.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of ITB, 1% of SLYG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITB | +1.3% | +5.4% | -1.5% | +5.3% | +8.1% | +14.1% | 0.64% |
| SLYG | +1.2% | +25.9% | +33.5% | +15.2% | +6.7% | +11.2% | 0.64% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ITB vs SLYG →
Shared Holdings(6)
The top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by IBP, CVCO and GFF.
2.44% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
1.53% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.63% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.67% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.59% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.80% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ITB and SLYG overlap?
ITB and SLYG overlap by 1.9% of portfolio weight. They share 6 holdings (ITB holds 46 positions and SLYG holds 349), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ITB and SLYG?
The two portfolios are 1.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ITB and SLYG?
The largest positions held by both funds are IBP, CVCO, GFF, SKY and HAYW. Together the top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does ITB own that SLYG doesn't?
40 positions (92.2% of ITB) are unique to ITB, led by DHI, PHM and LEN. In the other direction, 343 positions (97.8% of SLYG) are unique to SLYG.