ITB vs SLYV: Holdings Overlap
ITBiShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
iShares · 46 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-03-31
SLYVState Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 462 holdings · $5.1B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (ITB: 2026-03-31, SLYV: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ITB and SLYV?
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB, by iShares) holds 46 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 462. They have 15 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 15ITB holds 46 · SLYV holds 462
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ITB 10%·SLYV 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ITB
31 of 46 positions (89.7% of the fund) are not held by SLYV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ITB | SLYV |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 73.0% | 15.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 22.1% |
| Industrials | 20.8% | 13.2% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 11.8% |
| Real Estate | 0.0% | 6.9% |
| Other Sectors | 6.0% | 29.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 1.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of ITB, 1% of SLYV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITB | +1.3% | +5.4% | -1.5% | +5.3% | +8.1% | +14.1% | 0.64% |
| SLYV | +3.6% | +23.2% | +39.5% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +10.3% | 1.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ITB vs SLYV →
Shared Holdings(15)
The top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the overlap, led by MHK, MTH and MHO.
1.14% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
1.68% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
1.30% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.67% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.23% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.59% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.63% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.30% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.59% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.26% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.30% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.33% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.18% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.80% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.16% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ITB and SLYV overlap?
ITB and SLYV overlap by 3.5% of portfolio weight. They share 15 holdings (ITB holds 46 positions and SLYV holds 462), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ITB and SLYV?
The two portfolios are 3.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ITB and SLYV?
The largest positions held by both funds are MHK, MTH, MHO, SKY and MBC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the total overlap.
What does ITB own that SLYV doesn't?
31 positions (89.7% of ITB) are unique to ITB, led by DHI, PHM and LEN. In the other direction, 447 positions (96.4% of SLYV) are unique to SLYV.