ITOT vs QQQM: Holdings Overlap
ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
iShares · 2487 holdings · $97.6B · as of 2026-03-31
Invesco · 101 holdings · $97.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ITOT: 2026-03-31, QQQM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ITOT and QQQM?
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT, by iShares) holds 2487 positions; Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 93 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 45.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 45.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 93ITOT holds 2487 · QQQM holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ITOT 45%·QQQM 97%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ITOT
2394 of 2487 positions (54.4% of the fund) are not held by QQQM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ITOT | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 30.8% | 57.8% |
| Communication Services | 9.7% | 14.2% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 0.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.9% | 11.4% |
| Industrials | 10.2% | 3.2% |
| Other Sectors | 26.2% | 12.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOT | +3.3% | +14.6% | +24.1% | +20.9% | +12.3% | +14.9% | 0.97% |
| QQQM | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.7% | +25.3% | +15.2% | — | 0.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ITOT vs QQQM →
Shared Holdings(93)
The top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
6.69% | 8.13% | 6.69% | |
5.88% | 7.26% | 5.88% | |
4.34% | 5.30% | 4.34% | |
3.21% | 4.60% | 3.21% | |
2.64% | 3.51% | 2.64% | |
2.32% | 3.36% | 2.32% | |
2.12% | 3.24% | 2.12% | |
1.98% | 2.96% | 1.98% | |
1.65% | 3.45% | 1.65% | |
0.86% | 2.47% | 0.86% | |
0.70% | 1.86% | 0.70% | |
0.64% | 1.59% | 0.64% | |
0.60% | 4.78% | 0.60% | |
0.53% | 1.57% | 0.53% | |
0.52% | 3.68% | 0.52% | |
0.48% | 2.08% | 0.48% | |
0.43% | 1.56% | 0.43% | |
0.42% | 1.74% | 0.42% | |
0.36% | 1.01% | 0.36% | |
0.33% | 0.86% | 0.33% | |
0.33% | 2.51% | 0.33% | |
0.30% | 1.10% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.79% | 0.30% | |
0.28% | 1.21% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 0.73% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ITOT and QQQM overlap?
ITOT and QQQM overlap by 45.3% of portfolio weight. They share 93 holdings (ITOT holds 2487 positions and QQQM holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ITOT and QQQM?
The two portfolios are 45.3% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ITOT and QQQM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the total overlap.
What does ITOT own that QQQM doesn't?
2394 positions (54.4% of ITOT) are unique to ITOT, led by BRK-B, JPM and LLY. In the other direction, 8 positions (2.7% of QQQM) are unique to QQQM.