ITOT vs SCHA: Holdings Overlap
ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
iShares · 2487 holdings · $97.6B · as of 2026-03-31
Schwab · 1705 holdings · $23.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ITOT: 2026-03-31, SCHA: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ITOT and SCHA?
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT, by iShares) holds 2487 positions; Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA, by Schwab) holds 1705. They have 1536 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1536ITOT holds 2487 · SCHA holds 1705
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ITOT 6%·SCHA 99%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ITOT
951 of 2487 positions (93.3% of the fund) are not held by SCHA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ITOT | SCHA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 30.8% | 22.1% |
| Industrials | 10.2% | 17.7% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 15.1% |
| Health Care | 9.9% | 13.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.9% | 9.3% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 21.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.1% | 0.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of ITOT, 1% of SCHA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOT | +3.3% | +14.6% | +24.1% | +20.9% | +12.3% | +14.9% | 0.97% |
| SCHA | +1.0% | +22.8% | +36.7% | +17.1% | +7.9% | +10.8% | 1.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ITOT vs SCHA →
Shared Holdings(1536)
The top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the overlap, led by SNDK, LITE and ATI.
0.15% | 5.28% | 0.15% | |
0.08% | 1.29% | 0.08% | |
0.03% | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.42% | 0.03% | |
0.02% | 0.37% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.46% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.50% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.30% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.26% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.24% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.31% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.26% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.56% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.25% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.26% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.30% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.24% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.35% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.28% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.31% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.26% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.20% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% |
Showing the top 250 of 1536 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ITOT and SCHA overlap?
ITOT and SCHA overlap by 6.5% of portfolio weight. They share 1536 holdings (ITOT holds 2487 positions and SCHA holds 1705), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ITOT and SCHA?
The two portfolios are 6.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ITOT and SCHA?
The largest positions held by both funds are SNDK, LITE, ATI, NXT and RVMD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the total overlap.
What does ITOT own that SCHA doesn't?
951 positions (93.3% of ITOT) are unique to ITOT, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 169 positions (1.0% of SCHA) are unique to SCHA.