ITOT vs SMH: Holdings Overlap
ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
iShares · 2487 holdings · $97.6B · as of 2026-03-31
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are ITOT and SMH?
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT, by iShares) holds 2487 positions; VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21ITOT holds 2487 · SMH holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ITOT 13%·SMH 81%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ITOT
2466 of 2487 positions (86.7% of the fund) are not held by SMH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ITOT | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 30.8% | 99.9% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 10.2% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 9.9% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.9% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOT | +3.3% | +14.6% | +24.1% | +20.9% | +12.3% | +14.9% | 0.97% |
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ITOT vs SMH →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 93% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and MU.
6.69% | 19.64% | 6.69% | |
2.32% | 7.79% | 2.32% | |
0.60% | 4.23% | 0.60% | |
0.52% | 4.68% | 0.52% | |
0.43% | 4.59% | 0.43% | |
0.42% | 4.60% | 0.42% | |
0.33% | 4.34% | 0.33% | |
0.30% | 4.74% | 0.30% | |
0.28% | 4.61% | 0.28% | |
0.25% | 4.70% | 0.25% | |
0.22% | 4.09% | 0.22% | |
0.14% | 2.35% | 0.14% | |
0.12% | 2.50% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 2.43% | 0.12% | |
0.08% | 1.23% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 1.24% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 1.41% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 1.00% | 0.06% | |
0.04% | 0.60% | 0.04% | |
0.02% | 0.44% | 0.02% | |
0.01% | 0.21% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ITOT and SMH overlap?
ITOT and SMH overlap by 13.1% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (ITOT holds 2487 positions and SMH holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ITOT and SMH?
The two portfolios are 13.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ITOT and SMH?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, MU, AMD and AMAT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 93% of the total overlap.
What does ITOT own that SMH doesn't?
2466 positions (86.7% of ITOT) are unique to ITOT, led by AAPL, MSFT and AMZN. In the other direction, 4 positions (18.5% of SMH) are unique to SMH.