IUSG vs QQQM: Holdings Overlap
IUSGiShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
iShares · 385 holdings · $33.6B · as of 2026-03-31
Invesco · 101 holdings · $97.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IUSG: 2026-03-31, QQQM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IUSG and QQQM?
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG, by iShares) holds 385 positions; Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 47 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 51.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 51.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 47IUSG holds 385 · QQQM holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IUSG 67%·QQQM 73%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IUSG
338 of 385 positions (33.1% of the fund) are not held by QQQM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IUSG | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 46.0% | 57.8% |
| Communication Services | 16.0% | 14.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.4% | 11.4% |
| Financials | 9.6% | 0.2% |
| Industrials | 8.1% | 3.2% |
| Other Sectors | 10.6% | 12.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSG | +4.3% | +15.9% | +25.6% | +26.2% | +13.9% | +17.5% | 0.48% |
| QQQM | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.7% | +25.3% | +15.2% | — | 0.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IUSG vs QQQM →
Shared Holdings(47)
The top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
13.84% | 8.13% | 8.13% | |
6.08% | 7.26% | 6.08% | |
8.97% | 5.30% | 5.30% | |
3.52% | 4.60% | 3.52% | |
5.47% | 3.51% | 3.51% | |
4.79% | 3.36% | 3.36% | |
4.38% | 3.24% | 3.24% | |
4.09% | 2.96% | 2.96% | |
2.12% | 3.45% | 2.12% | |
1.33% | 1.59% | 1.33% | |
1.24% | 4.78% | 1.24% | |
1.09% | 1.57% | 1.09% | |
1.08% | 3.68% | 1.08% | |
0.89% | 1.56% | 0.89% | |
0.87% | 1.74% | 0.87% | |
0.63% | 1.10% | 0.63% | |
0.53% | 0.66% | 0.53% | |
0.53% | 2.08% | 0.53% | |
0.44% | 0.58% | 0.44% | |
0.42% | 0.79% | 0.42% | |
0.35% | 0.82% | 0.35% | |
0.32% | 0.81% | 0.32% | |
0.31% | 1.09% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 0.73% | 0.30% | |
0.25% | 0.32% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IUSG and QQQM overlap?
IUSG and QQQM overlap by 51.7% of portfolio weight. They share 47 holdings (IUSG holds 385 positions and QQQM holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IUSG and QQQM?
The two portfolios are 51.7% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IUSG and QQQM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the total overlap.
What does IUSG own that QQQM doesn't?
338 positions (33.1% of IUSG) are unique to IUSG, led by BRK-B, LLY and JPM. In the other direction, 54 positions (26.3% of QQQM) are unique to QQQM.