IVV vs MTUM: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 125 holdings · $26.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IVV: 2026-03-31, MTUM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IVV and MTUM?
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503 positions; iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM, by iShares) holds 125. They have 105 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 33.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 33.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 105IVV holds 503 · MTUM holds 125
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IVV 36%·MTUM 98%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IVV
398 of 503 positions (63.5% of the fund) are not held by MTUM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MTUM
20 of 125 positions (1.9% of the fund) are not held by IVV.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IVV | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 32.6% | 44.3% |
| Industrials | 9.0% | 15.6% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 10.3% |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 7.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 3.6% |
| Other Sectors | 25.3% | 18.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
| MTUM | -1.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% | +29.4% | +12.8% | +16.1% | 0.60% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IVV vs MTUM →
Shared Holdings(105)
The top 10 shared positions account for 56% of the overlap, led by NVDA, GOOGL and AVGO.
7.56% | 4.64% | 4.64% | |
2.99% | 2.94% | 2.94% | |
2.62% | 5.40% | 2.62% | |
2.39% | 2.39% | 2.39% | |
1.42% | 2.87% | 1.42% | |
1.27% | 3.43% | 1.27% | |
1.05% | 3.76% | 1.05% | |
0.97% | 2.75% | 0.97% | |
0.68% | 5.56% | 0.68% | |
0.60% | 1.52% | 0.60% | |
0.59% | 4.03% | 0.59% | |
0.59% | 3.21% | 0.59% | |
0.53% | 1.90% | 0.53% | |
0.48% | 2.36% | 0.48% | |
0.48% | 3.61% | 0.48% | |
0.46% | 1.46% | 0.46% | |
0.45% | 1.69% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 1.26% | 0.44% | |
0.42% | 2.53% | 0.42% | |
0.40% | 1.20% | 0.40% | |
0.37% | 3.83% | 0.37% | |
0.35% | 1.13% | 0.35% | |
0.35% | 1.32% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 1.61% | 0.34% | |
0.32% | 0.90% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IVV and MTUM overlap?
IVV and MTUM overlap by 33.2% of portfolio weight. They share 105 holdings (IVV holds 503 positions and MTUM holds 125), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IVV and MTUM?
The two portfolios are 33.2% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IVV and MTUM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG and JPM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 56% of the total overlap.
What does IVV own that MTUM doesn't?
398 positions (63.5% of IVV) are unique to IVV, led by AAPL, MSFT and AMZN. In the other direction, 20 positions (1.9% of MTUM) are unique to MTUM.