IVV vs NOBL: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
ProShares · 69 holdings · $11.9B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IVV: 2026-03-31, NOBL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IVV and NOBL?
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503 positions; ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL, by ProShares) holds 69. They have 69 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 69IVV holds 503 · NOBL holds 69
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IVV 13%·NOBL 100%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IVV
434 of 503 positions (87.2% of the fund) are not held by NOBL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in NOBL
Every position in NOBL is also held by IVV, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IVV | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 32.6% | 3.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 5.2% | 23.5% |
| Industrials | 9.0% | 21.8% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 12.7% |
| Materials | 2.1% | 11.5% |
| Other Sectors | 38.2% | 27.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
| NOBL | +1.6% | +13.4% | +15.9% | +9.0% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IVV vs NOBL →
Shared Holdings(69)
The top 10 shared positions account for 57% of the overlap, led by XOM, JNJ and WMT.
1.27% | 1.44% | 1.27% | |
1.05% | 1.46% | 1.05% | |
0.97% | 1.31% | 0.97% | |
0.69% | 1.44% | 0.69% | |
0.69% | 1.56% | 0.69% | |
0.60% | 1.48% | 0.60% | |
0.59% | 1.60% | 0.59% | |
0.53% | 1.55% | 0.53% | |
0.41% | 1.47% | 0.41% | |
0.40% | 1.71% | 0.40% | |
0.40% | 1.36% | 0.40% | |
0.38% | 1.36% | 0.38% | |
0.35% | 1.41% | 0.35% | |
0.32% | 1.35% | 0.32% | |
0.24% | 1.25% | 0.24% | |
0.23% | 1.40% | 0.23% | |
0.21% | 1.39% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 1.32% | 0.20% | |
0.16% | 1.56% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 1.60% | 0.15% | |
0.13% | 1.33% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 1.46% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 1.61% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 1.34% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 1.39% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IVV and NOBL overlap?
IVV and NOBL overlap by 12.5% of portfolio weight. They share 69 holdings (IVV holds 503 positions and NOBL holds 69), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IVV and NOBL?
The two portfolios are 12.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IVV and NOBL?
The largest positions held by both funds are XOM, JNJ, WMT, CVX and ABBV. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 57% of the total overlap.
What does IVV own that NOBL doesn't?
434 positions (87.2% of IVV) are unique to IVV, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 0 positions (0.0% of NOBL) are unique to NOBL.