IVV vs SCHG: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab · 193 holdings · $62.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IVV: 2026-03-31, SCHG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IVV and SCHG?
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503 positions; Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG, by Schwab) holds 193. They have 119 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 53.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 53.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 119IVV holds 503 · SCHG holds 193
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IVV 53%·SCHG 95%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IVV
384 of 503 positions (46.7% of the fund) are not held by SCHG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IVV | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 32.6% | 45.9% |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 15.3% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 6.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 12.3% |
| Health Care | 9.4% | 8.4% |
| Other Sectors | 24.8% | 11.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
| SCHG | +4.3% | +9.9% | +19.1% | +24.1% | +14.0% | +18.6% | 0.37% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IVV vs SCHG →
Shared Holdings(119)
The top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
7.56% | 11.01% | 7.56% | |
6.65% | 9.83% | 6.65% | |
4.91% | 7.17% | 4.91% | |
3.63% | 5.67% | 3.63% | |
2.99% | 4.75% | 2.99% | |
2.62% | 4.55% | 2.62% | |
2.39% | 3.78% | 2.39% | |
2.23% | 3.45% | 2.23% | |
1.87% | 3.91% | 1.87% | |
1.30% | 3.05% | 1.30% | |
0.91% | 1.92% | 0.91% | |
0.79% | 1.48% | 0.79% | |
0.73% | 1.40% | 0.73% | |
0.72% | 1.27% | 0.72% | |
0.60% | 1.25% | 0.60% | |
0.59% | 2.93% | 0.59% | |
0.53% | 1.18% | 0.53% | |
0.44% | 1.20% | 0.44% | |
0.42% | 0.91% | 0.42% | |
0.41% | 0.81% | 0.41% | |
0.34% | 0.88% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.65% | 0.33% | |
0.31% | 0.62% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 0.63% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 0.53% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IVV and SCHG overlap?
IVV and SCHG overlap by 53.1% of portfolio weight. They share 119 holdings (IVV holds 503 positions and SCHG holds 193), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IVV and SCHG?
The two portfolios are 53.1% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IVV and SCHG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the total overlap.
What does IVV own that SCHG doesn't?
384 positions (46.7% of IVV) are unique to IVV, led by BRK-B, JPM and XOM. In the other direction, 74 positions (4.9% of SCHG) are unique to SCHG.