IVV vs XLG: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Invesco · 51 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IVV: 2026-03-31, XLG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IVV and XLG?
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG, by Invesco) holds 51. They have 51 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 59.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 59.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 51IVV holds 503 · XLG holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IVV 60%·XLG 100%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IVV
452 of 503 positions (40.2% of the fund) are not held by XLG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in XLG
Every position in XLG is also held by IVV, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IVV | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 32.6% | 43.7% |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 17.0% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 9.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.8% | 11.3% |
| Health Care | 9.4% | 7.0% |
| Other Sectors | 24.8% | 11.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
| XLG | +3.7% | +7.2% | +17.9% | +22.2% | +14.3% | +16.6% | 0.63% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IVV vs XLG →
Shared Holdings(51)
The top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
7.56% | 13.04% | 7.56% | |
6.65% | 10.71% | 6.65% | |
4.91% | 8.14% | 4.91% | |
3.63% | 6.96% | 3.63% | |
2.99% | 6.03% | 2.99% | |
2.62% | 4.83% | 2.62% | |
2.39% | 4.80% | 2.39% | |
2.23% | 3.60% | 2.23% | |
1.87% | 2.89% | 1.87% | |
1.57% | 2.34% | 1.57% | |
1.42% | 2.27% | 1.42% | |
1.30% | 1.99% | 1.30% | |
1.27% | 1.73% | 1.27% | |
1.05% | 1.49% | 1.05% | |
0.97% | 1.56% | 0.97% | |
0.91% | 1.49% | 0.91% | |
0.79% | 1.21% | 0.79% | |
0.73% | 1.10% | 0.73% | |
0.72% | 1.06% | 0.72% | |
0.69% | 0.97% | 0.69% | |
0.69% | 1.00% | 0.69% | |
0.60% | 0.92% | 0.60% | |
0.60% | 0.85% | 0.60% | |
0.59% | 1.55% | 0.59% | |
0.59% | 1.11% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IVV and XLG overlap?
IVV and XLG overlap by 59.5% of portfolio weight. They share 51 holdings (IVV holds 503 positions and XLG holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IVV and XLG?
The two portfolios are 59.5% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IVV and XLG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the total overlap.
What does IVV own that XLG doesn't?
452 positions (40.2% of IVV) are unique to IVV, led by MU, AMAT and LRCX. In the other direction, 0 positions (0.0% of XLG) are unique to XLG.