IVW vs QQQM: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 143 holdings · $77.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Invesco · 101 holdings · $97.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IVW: 2026-03-31, QQQM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IVW and QQQM?
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW, by iShares) holds 143 positions; Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 47 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 53.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 53.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 47IVW holds 143 · QQQM holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IVW 71%·QQQM 73%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IVW
96 of 143 positions (29.4% of the fund) are not held by QQQM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IVW | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 47.7% | 57.8% |
| Communication Services | 16.8% | 14.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.4% | 11.4% |
| Financials | 9.8% | 0.2% |
| Industrials | 6.8% | 3.2% |
| Other Sectors | 9.4% | 12.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | +4.4% | +15.5% | +25.3% | +26.7% | +14.0% | +17.7% | 0.35% |
| QQQM | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.7% | +25.3% | +15.2% | — | 0.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IVW vs QQQM →
Shared Holdings(47)
The top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
14.62% | 8.13% | 8.13% | |
6.43% | 7.26% | 6.43% | |
9.48% | 5.30% | 5.30% | |
3.72% | 4.60% | 3.72% | |
5.78% | 3.51% | 3.51% | |
5.06% | 3.36% | 3.36% | |
4.63% | 3.24% | 3.24% | |
4.32% | 2.96% | 2.96% | |
2.24% | 3.45% | 2.24% | |
1.40% | 1.59% | 1.40% | |
1.31% | 4.78% | 1.31% | |
1.15% | 1.57% | 1.15% | |
1.14% | 3.68% | 1.14% | |
0.94% | 1.56% | 0.94% | |
0.92% | 1.74% | 0.92% | |
0.67% | 1.10% | 0.67% | |
0.56% | 0.66% | 0.56% | |
0.56% | 2.08% | 0.56% | |
0.47% | 0.58% | 0.47% | |
0.44% | 0.79% | 0.44% | |
0.37% | 0.82% | 0.37% | |
0.34% | 0.81% | 0.34% | |
0.32% | 1.09% | 0.32% | |
0.32% | 0.73% | 0.32% | |
0.27% | 0.32% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IVW and QQQM overlap?
IVW and QQQM overlap by 53.1% of portfolio weight. They share 47 holdings (IVW holds 143 positions and QQQM holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IVW and QQQM?
The two portfolios are 53.1% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IVW and QQQM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the total overlap.
What does IVW own that QQQM doesn't?
96 positions (29.4% of IVW) are unique to IVW, led by BRK-B, LLY and JPM. In the other direction, 54 positions (26.3% of QQQM) are unique to QQQM.