IWD vs IWF: Holdings Overlap
IWDiShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
iShares · 866 holdings · $83.6B · as of 2026-03-31
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
iShares · 387 holdings · $127.3B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWD and IWF?
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD, by iShares) holds 866 positions; iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF, by iShares) holds 387. They have 248 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 248IWD holds 866 · IWF holds 387
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWD 30%·IWF 27%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWD
618 of 866 positions (70.1% of the fund) are not held by IWF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWD | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 11.7% | 49.2% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 5.9% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 6.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.0% | 13.1% |
| Communication Services | 7.9% | 12.4% |
| Other Sectors | 39.8% | 12.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWD | +4.0% | +23.3% | +34.5% | +19.0% | +11.9% | +11.7% | 1.36% |
| IWF | +2.7% | +5.5% | +13.1% | +22.0% | +12.6% | +17.8% | 0.35% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWD vs IWF →
Shared Holdings(248)
The top 10 shared positions account for 60% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, AMZN and GOOG.
1.95% | 3.54% | 1.95% | |
1.81% | 4.66% | 1.81% | |
1.59% | 2.87% | 1.59% | |
0.73% | 3.46% | 0.73% | |
0.50% | 0.52% | 0.50% | |
0.45% | 0.69% | 0.45% | |
0.29% | 0.32% | 0.29% | |
0.64% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.34% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 0.90% | 0.26% | |
1.60% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.36% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.42% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.50% | 0.16% | |
0.95% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.53% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.30% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.35% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.14% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.60% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.28% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.11% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.97% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.17% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWD and IWF overlap?
IWD and IWF overlap by 13.5% of portfolio weight. They share 248 holdings (IWD holds 866 positions and IWF holds 387), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWD and IWF?
The two portfolios are 13.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWD and IWF?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, AMZN, GOOG, META and KO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 60% of the total overlap.
What does IWD own that IWF doesn't?
618 positions (70.1% of IWD) are unique to IWD, led by BRK-B, JPM and XOM. In the other direction, 139 positions (72.8% of IWF) are unique to IWF.