IWD vs QQQM: Holdings Overlap
IWDiShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
iShares · 866 holdings · $83.6B · as of 2026-03-31
Invesco · 101 holdings · $97.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IWD: 2026-03-31, QQQM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWD and QQQM?
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD, by iShares) holds 866 positions; Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 59 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 21.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 21.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 59IWD holds 866 · QQQM holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWD 21%·QQQM 52%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWD
807 of 866 positions (78.3% of the fund) are not held by QQQM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWD | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 11.7% | 57.8% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 0.2% |
| Communication Services | 7.9% | 14.2% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 3.2% |
| Health Care | 11.7% | 3.7% |
| Other Sectors | 35.1% | 20.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWD | +4.0% | +23.3% | +34.5% | +19.0% | +11.9% | +11.7% | 1.36% |
| QQQM | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.7% | +25.3% | +15.2% | — | 0.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWD vs QQQM →
Shared Holdings(59)
The top 10 shared positions account for 56% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, AMZN and WMT.
1.95% | 3.51% | 1.95% | |
1.81% | 4.60% | 1.81% | |
1.60% | 2.47% | 1.60% | |
1.59% | 3.24% | 1.59% | |
1.24% | 4.78% | 1.24% | |
1.02% | 2.08% | 1.02% | |
0.77% | 1.01% | 0.77% | |
0.73% | 2.96% | 0.73% | |
0.64% | 2.51% | 0.64% | |
0.64% | 1.56% | 0.64% | |
0.60% | 0.86% | 0.60% | |
0.51% | 0.88% | 0.51% | |
0.47% | 0.66% | 0.47% | |
0.45% | 3.68% | 0.45% | |
0.42% | 0.73% | 0.42% | |
0.35% | 1.17% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 1.21% | 0.34% | |
0.34% | 0.39% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.90% | 0.33% | |
0.30% | 0.79% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 1.09% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 0.49% | 0.29% | |
0.29% | 0.46% | 0.29% | |
0.26% | 0.28% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 0.78% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWD and QQQM overlap?
IWD and QQQM overlap by 21.4% of portfolio weight. They share 59 holdings (IWD holds 866 positions and QQQM holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWD and QQQM?
The two portfolios are 21.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWD and QQQM?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, AMZN, WMT, GOOG and MU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 56% of the total overlap.
What does IWD own that QQQM doesn't?
807 positions (78.3% of IWD) are unique to IWD, led by BRK-B, JPM and XOM. In the other direction, 42 positions (47.8% of QQQM) are unique to QQQM.