IWD vs SCHV: Holdings Overlap
IWDiShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
iShares · 866 holdings · $83.6B · as of 2026-03-31
SCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab · 555 holdings · $16.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IWD: 2026-03-31, SCHV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWD and SCHV?
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD, by iShares) holds 866 positions; Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV, by Schwab) holds 555. They have 500 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 74.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 74.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 500IWD holds 866 · SCHV holds 555
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWD 77%·SCHV 90%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWD
366 of 866 positions (22.7% of the fund) are not held by SCHV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWD | SCHV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 11.7% | 21.3% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 18.9% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 14.0% |
| Health Care | 11.7% | 10.8% |
| Consumer Staples | 7.5% | 8.3% |
| Other Sectors | 35.6% | 26.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWD | +4.0% | +23.3% | +34.5% | +19.0% | +11.9% | +11.7% | 1.36% |
| SCHV | +1.5% | +18.8% | +27.7% | +17.6% | +10.9% | +11.4% | 1.75% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWD vs SCHV →
Shared Holdings(500)
The top 10 shared positions account for 22% of the overlap, led by BRK-B, JPM and XOM.
2.91% | 2.82% | 2.82% | |
2.63% | 2.62% | 2.62% | |
2.36% | 1.97% | 1.97% | |
1.94% | 1.76% | 1.76% | |
1.60% | 1.65% | 1.60% | |
1.24% | 3.54% | 1.24% | |
1.28% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
1.12% | 1.08% | 1.08% | |
1.02% | 1.54% | 1.02% | |
0.97% | 1.11% | 0.97% | |
0.98% | 0.96% | 0.96% | |
0.95% | 1.32% | 0.95% | |
0.85% | 0.90% | 0.85% | |
0.85% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
0.81% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
0.77% | 1.00% | 0.77% | |
0.74% | 0.90% | 0.74% | |
0.70% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.69% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
0.64% | 1.75% | 0.64% | |
0.64% | 1.16% | 0.64% | |
0.61% | 0.81% | 0.61% | |
0.60% | 0.64% | 0.60% | |
0.64% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
0.66% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
Showing the top 250 of 500 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWD and SCHV overlap?
IWD and SCHV overlap by 74.3% of portfolio weight. They share 500 holdings (IWD holds 866 positions and SCHV holds 555), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWD and SCHV?
The two portfolios are 74.3% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWD and SCHV?
The largest positions held by both funds are BRK-B, JPM, XOM, JNJ and WMT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 22% of the total overlap.
What does IWD own that SCHV doesn't?
366 positions (22.7% of IWD) are unique to IWD, led by GOOGL, AMZN and GOOG. In the other direction, 55 positions (9.4% of SCHV) are unique to SCHV.