IWD vs SMH: Holdings Overlap
IWDiShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
iShares · 866 holdings · $83.6B · as of 2026-03-31
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWD and SMH?
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD, by iShares) holds 866 positions; VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13IWD holds 866 · SMH holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWD 5%·SMH 39%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWD
853 of 866 positions (94.9% of the fund) are not held by SMH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWD | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 11.7% | 99.9% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 11.7% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 7.9% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 35.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWD | +4.0% | +23.3% | +34.5% | +19.0% | +11.9% | +11.7% | 1.36% |
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWD vs SMH →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 96% of the overlap, led by MU, INTC and AMAT.
1.24% | 4.23% | 1.24% | |
0.64% | 4.34% | 0.64% | |
0.64% | 4.59% | 0.64% | |
0.51% | 4.70% | 0.51% | |
0.45% | 4.68% | 0.45% | |
0.35% | 4.09% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 4.61% | 0.34% | |
0.26% | 2.35% | 0.26% | |
0.15% | 1.41% | 0.15% | |
0.11% | 1.00% | 0.11% | |
0.08% | 0.60% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 2.50% | 0.07% | |
0.03% | 0.21% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWD and SMH overlap?
IWD and SMH overlap by 4.9% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (IWD holds 866 positions and SMH holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWD and SMH?
The two portfolios are 4.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWD and SMH?
The largest positions held by both funds are MU, INTC, AMAT, ADI and AMD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 96% of the total overlap.
What does IWD own that SMH doesn't?
853 positions (94.9% of IWD) are unique to IWD, led by BRK-B, JPM and XOM. In the other direction, 12 positions (60.6% of SMH) are unique to SMH.