IWF vs SMH: Holdings Overlap
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
iShares · 387 holdings · $127.3B · as of 2026-03-31
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWF and SMH?
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF, by iShares) holds 387 positions; VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 21.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 21.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13IWF holds 387 · SMH holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWF 21%·SMH 64%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWF
374 of 387 positions (78.4% of the fund) are not held by SMH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWF | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.2% | 99.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.1% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 8.0% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 6.7% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 10.4% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | +2.7% | +5.5% | +13.1% | +22.0% | +12.6% | +17.8% | 0.35% |
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWF vs SMH →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and LRCX.
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 12.92% | 19.64% | 12.92% |
|---|---|---|---|
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 4.79% | 7.79% | 4.79% |
 LRCXLam Research Corporation COM NEW | 0.97% | 4.60% | 0.97% |
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 0.70% | 4.74% | 0.70% |
 AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. COM | 0.69% | 4.68% | 0.69% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc. COM | 0.28% | 4.59% | 0.28% |
 CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. COM | 0.27% | 2.43% | 0.27% |
 TXNTexas Instruments Inc. COM | 0.26% | 4.61% | 0.26% |
 SNPSSynopsys Inc COM | 0.20% | 2.50% | 0.20% |
 MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc. COM | 0.18% | 1.23% | 0.18% |
 QCOMQUALCOMM Inc. COM | 0.11% | 4.09% | 0.11% |
 ALABAstera Labs Inc COM | 0.05% | 0.44% | 0.05% |
 MRVLMarvell Technology Inc COM | 0.02% | 2.35% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWF and SMH overlap?
IWF and SMH overlap by 21.4% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (IWF holds 387 positions and SMH holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWF and SMH?
The two portfolios are 21.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWF and SMH?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, LRCX, KLAC and AMD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does IWF own that SMH doesn't?
374 positions (78.4% of IWF) are unique to IWF, led by AAPL, MSFT and AMZN. In the other direction, 12 positions (36.2% of SMH) are unique to SMH.