IWM vs SLYV: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 1941 holdings · $82.2B · as of 2026-03-31
SLYVState Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 462 holdings · $5.1B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IWM: 2026-03-31, SLYV: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWM and SLYV?
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM, by iShares) holds 1941 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 462. They have 393 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 28.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 28.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 393IWM holds 1941 · SLYV holds 462
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWM 29%·SLYV 76%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWM
1548 of 1941 positions (70.8% of the fund) are not held by SLYV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWM | SLYV |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 15.3% | 22.1% |
| Industrials | 17.9% | 13.2% |
| Health Care | 16.6% | 6.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.0% | 15.7% |
| Information Technology | 13.6% | 11.8% |
| Other Sectors | 22.7% | 29.6% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 1.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of IWM, 1% of SLYV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | +1.8% | +23.0% | +38.6% | +17.1% | +7.5% | +10.8% | 0.88% |
| SLYV | +3.6% | +23.2% | +39.5% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +10.3% | 1.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWM vs SLYV →
Shared Holdings(393)
The top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the overlap, led by SM, JXN and LUMN.
 SMSM Energy Co. COM | 0.26% | 0.70% | 0.26% |
|---|---|---|---|
 JXNJackson Financial, Inc., Class A | 0.24% | 1.00% | 0.24% |
 LUMNLumen Technologies Inc COM | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.23% |
 TRNOTerreno Realty Corporation COM | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.21% |
 NENoble Corporation PLC ORD SHS A | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.21% |
 EPRTEssential Properties Realty Trust Inc. COM | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.20% |
 GKOSGlaukos Corp. COM | 0.20% | 0.34% | 0.20% |
 MGYMagnolia Oil & Gas Corporation CL A | 0.19% | 0.61% | 0.19% |
 BCPCBalchem Corp COM | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.19% |
 PLXSPlexus Corp COM | 0.18% | 0.43% | 0.18% |
 PIPRPiper Sandler Companies COM NEW | 0.18% | 0.25% | 0.18% |
 CNRCore Natural Resources Inc. COM SHS | 0.18% | 0.49% | 0.18% |
 ACAArcosa Inc COM | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.18% |
 CRCCalifornia Resources Corporation COM STOCK | 0.17% | 0.44% | 0.17% |
 ABCBAmeris Bancorp COM | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.17% |
 MATXMatson Inc COM | 0.17% | 0.67% | 0.17% |
 AUBAtlantic Union Bankshares Corp COM | 0.17% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
 MACThe Macerich Company COM | 0.17% | 0.34% | 0.17% |
 HCCWarrior Met Coal Inc COM | 0.17% | 0.29% | 0.17% |
 PECOPhillips Edison & Co Inc COMMON STOCK | 0.16% | 0.23% | 0.16% |
 HASIHannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.16% |
 LBRTLiberty Energy, Inc., Class A | 0.15% | 0.35% | 0.15% |
 RDNRadian Group Inc. COM | 0.15% | 0.26% | 0.15% |
 ATMUAtmus Filtration Technologies Inc. COM | 0.16% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 REZIResideo Technologies Inc COM | 0.15% | 0.17% | 0.15% |
Showing the top 250 of 393 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWM and SLYV overlap?
IWM and SLYV overlap by 28.8% of portfolio weight. They share 393 holdings (IWM holds 1941 positions and SLYV holds 462), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWM and SLYV?
The two portfolios are 28.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWM and SLYV?
The largest positions held by both funds are SM, JXN, LUMN, TRNO and NE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the total overlap.
What does IWM own that SLYV doesn't?
1548 positions (70.8% of IWM) are unique to IWM, led by BE, CDE and FN. In the other direction, 69 positions (24.2% of SLYV) are unique to SLYV.