IWM vs SMH: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 1941 holdings · $82.2B · as of 2026-03-31
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWM and SMH?
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM, by iShares) holds 1941 positions; VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0IWM holds 1941 · SMH holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWM 0%·SMH 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWM
1941 of 1941 positions (99.7% of the fund) are not held by SMH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWM | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 13.6% | 99.9% |
| Industrials | 17.9% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 16.6% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 15.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.0% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 22.7% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of IWM, 0% of SMH).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | +1.8% | +23.0% | +38.6% | +17.1% | +7.5% | +10.8% | 0.88% |
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWM vs SMH →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWM and SMH overlap?
IWM and SMH overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (IWM holds 1941 positions and SMH holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWM and SMH?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does IWM own that SMH doesn't?
1941 positions (99.7% of IWM) are unique to IWM, led by BE, CDE and FN. In the other direction, 25 positions (99.9% of SMH) are unique to SMH.