IWN vs LIT: Holdings Overlap
IWNiShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
iShares · 1406 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IWN: 2026-03-31, LIT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWN and LIT?
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN, by iShares) holds 1406 positions; Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1IWN holds 1406 · LIT holds 41
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWN 0%·LIT 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWN
1405 of 1406 positions (99.2% of the fund) are not held by LIT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in LIT
40 of 41 positions (97.4% of the fund) are not held by IWN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWN | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 5.1% | 41.6% |
| Financials | 22.4% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 8.0% | 13.8% |
| Industrials | 11.9% | 8.5% |
| Health Care | 10.0% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 35.2% | 9.6% |
| Unclassified | 7.1% | 26.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of IWN, 26% of LIT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWN | +2.4% | +25.3% | +42.6% | +16.8% | +9.0% | +10.2% | 1.41% |
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWN vs LIT →
Shared Holdings(1)
 ENSEnerSys COM | 0.42% | 2.47% | 0.42% |
|---|
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWN and LIT overlap?
IWN and LIT overlap by 0.4% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (IWN holds 1406 positions and LIT holds 41), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWN and LIT?
The two portfolios are 0.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWN and LIT?
The largest positions held by both funds are ENS. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does IWN own that LIT doesn't?
1405 positions (99.2% of IWN) are unique to IWN, led by ECHO, TTMI and CDE. In the other direction, 40 positions (97.4% of LIT) are unique to LIT.