IWN vs SCHH: Holdings Overlap
IWNiShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
iShares · 1406 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Schwab · 117 holdings · $11.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IWN: 2026-03-31, SCHH: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWN and SCHH?
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN, by iShares) holds 1406 positions; Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH, by Schwab) holds 117. They have 56 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 56IWN holds 1406 · SCHH holds 117
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWN 8%·SCHH 10%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWN
1350 of 1406 positions (92.0% of the fund) are not held by SCHH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWN | SCHH |
|---|---|---|
| Real Estate | 8.4% | 99.8% |
| Financials | 22.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 11.9% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 10.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.7% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 31.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 7.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of IWN, 0% of SCHH).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWN | +2.4% | +25.3% | +42.6% | +16.8% | +9.0% | +10.2% | 1.41% |
| SCHH | -0.2% | +16.9% | +18.0% | +10.5% | +3.0% | +3.7% | 2.74% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWN vs SCHH →
Shared Holdings(56)
The top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the overlap, led by CTRE, TRNO and EPRT.
0.51% | 0.65% | 0.51% | |
0.43% | 0.49% | 0.43% | |
0.42% | 0.46% | 0.42% | |
0.38% | 0.61% | 0.38% | |
0.37% | 0.42% | 0.37% | |
0.34% | 0.44% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.36% | 0.33% | |
0.27% | 0.36% | 0.27% | |
0.25% | 0.27% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.27% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.26% | 0.24% | |
0.20% | 0.25% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 0.22% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 0.23% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.23% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.20% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.20% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.19% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.20% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.18% | 0.17% | |
0.13% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.13% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.13% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.15% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWN and SCHH overlap?
IWN and SCHH overlap by 7.6% of portfolio weight. They share 56 holdings (IWN holds 1406 positions and SCHH holds 117), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWN and SCHH?
The two portfolios are 7.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWN and SCHH?
The largest positions held by both funds are CTRE, TRNO, EPRT, AHR and KRG. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the total overlap.
What does IWN own that SCHH doesn't?
1350 positions (92.0% of IWN) are unique to IWN, led by ECHO, TTMI and CDE. In the other direction, 61 positions (90.2% of SCHH) are unique to SCHH.