IWO vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
iShares · 1101 holdings · $14.8B · as of 2026-03-31
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IWO: 2026-03-31, KOMP: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWO and KOMP?
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO, by iShares) holds 1101 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 131 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 131IWO holds 1101 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWO 19%·KOMP 26%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWO
970 of 1101 positions (80.4% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWO | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.0% | 29.9% |
| Industrials | 23.7% | 27.4% |
| Health Care | 23.1% | 12.4% |
| Financials | 8.6% | 1.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.3% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 14.1% | 9.7% |
| Unclassified | 4.0% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (4% of IWO, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWO | +1.2% | +21.0% | +34.7% | +17.5% | +5.9% | +11.0% | 0.42% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWO vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(131)
The top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the overlap, led by AVAV, KTOS and SLAB.
0.46% | 0.96% | 0.46% | |
0.86% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.46% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.99% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 0.35% | 0.29% | |
0.29% | 0.42% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.29% | 0.28% | |
0.55% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 0.51% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.35% | 0.21% | |
0.21% | 0.49% | 0.21% | |
0.51% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.25% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.49% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.21% | 0.20% | |
0.21% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 1.12% | 0.19% | |
0.94% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.17% | 0.23% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.19% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.62% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.22% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.14% | 1.06% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWO and KOMP overlap?
IWO and KOMP overlap by 10.9% of portfolio weight. They share 131 holdings (IWO holds 1101 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWO and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 10.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWO and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVAV, KTOS, SLAB, BE and ALKS. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the total overlap.
What does IWO own that KOMP doesn't?
970 positions (80.4% of IWO) are unique to IWO, led by FN, CRDO and AEIS. In the other direction, 370 positions (73.5% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.