IWO vs VCR: Holdings Overlap
IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
iShares · 1101 holdings · $14.8B · as of 2026-03-31
VCRVanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund
Vanguard · 283 holdings · $6.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IWO: 2026-03-31, VCR: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWO and VCR?
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO, by iShares) holds 1101 positions; Vanguard Consumer Discretionary Index Fund (VCR, by Vanguard) holds 283. They have 83 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 83IWO holds 1101 · VCR holds 283
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWO 7%·VCR 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWO
1018 of 1101 positions (92.7% of the fund) are not held by VCR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWO | VCR |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.3% | 99.6% |
| Industrials | 23.7% | 0.3% |
| Health Care | 23.1% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 19.0% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 8.6% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 14.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 4.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (4% of IWO, 0% of VCR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWO | +1.2% | +21.0% | +34.7% | +17.5% | +5.9% | +11.0% | 0.42% |
| VCR | +1.8% | +2.7% | +9.3% | +12.2% | +5.9% | +13.5% | 0.71% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWO vs VCR →
Shared Holdings(83)
The top 10 shared positions account for 28% of the overlap, led by EAT, LTH and BOOT.
0.42% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.27% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.30% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.26% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.25% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.26% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.25% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.41% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.11% | 0.10% | |
0.11% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.19% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.13% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.28% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.21% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.17% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.16% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.11% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.28% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.24% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.17% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.16% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.14% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWO and VCR overlap?
IWO and VCR overlap by 4.1% of portfolio weight. They share 83 holdings (IWO holds 1101 positions and VCR holds 283), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWO and VCR?
The two portfolios are 4.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWO and VCR?
The largest positions held by both funds are EAT, LTH, BOOT, FTDR and CVCO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 28% of the total overlap.
What does IWO own that VCR doesn't?
1018 positions (92.7% of IWO) are unique to IWO, led by BE, FN and CRDO. In the other direction, 200 positions (94.8% of VCR) are unique to VCR.