IWO vs XSD: Holdings Overlap
IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
iShares · 1101 holdings · $14.8B · as of 2026-03-31
XSDState Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 46 holdings · $2.9B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IWO: 2026-03-31, XSD: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWO and XSD?
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO, by iShares) holds 1101 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF (XSD, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 46. They have 17 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 17IWO holds 1101 · XSD holds 46
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWO 4%·XSD 34%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWO
1084 of 1101 positions (95.7% of the fund) are not held by XSD. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWO | XSD |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.0% | 95.2% |
| Industrials | 23.7% | 1.8% |
| Health Care | 23.1% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 8.6% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.3% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 14.1% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 4.0% | 2.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (4% of IWO, 3% of XSD).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWO | +1.2% | +21.0% | +34.7% | +17.5% | +5.9% | +11.0% | 0.42% |
| XSD | +1.8% | +69.5% | +104.0% | +35.6% | +22.7% | +27.6% | 0.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWO vs XSD →
Shared Holdings(17)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by CRDO, RMBS and SITM.
1.02% | 2.49% | 1.02% | |
0.62% | 1.82% | 0.62% | |
0.52% | 2.66% | 0.52% | |
0.48% | 2.24% | 0.48% | |
0.46% | 2.57% | 0.46% | |
0.31% | 2.18% | 0.31% | |
0.19% | 3.60% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 2.03% | 0.19% | |
0.14% | 3.44% | 0.14% | |
0.03% | 0.88% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 1.28% | 0.03% | |
0.02% | 0.60% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 1.55% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.81% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 1.48% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 2.03% | 0.02% | |
0.01% | 2.50% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWO and XSD overlap?
IWO and XSD overlap by 4.1% of portfolio weight. They share 17 holdings (IWO holds 1101 positions and XSD holds 46), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWO and XSD?
The two portfolios are 4.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWO and XSD?
The largest positions held by both funds are CRDO, RMBS, SITM, SMTC and SLAB. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does IWO own that XSD doesn't?
1084 positions (95.7% of IWO) are unique to IWO, led by BE, FN and NXT. In the other direction, 29 positions (65.8% of XSD) are unique to XSD.