IWP vs IWR: Holdings Overlap
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
IWRiShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 806 holdings · $57.6B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWP and IWR?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR, by iShares) holds 806. They have 277 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 31.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 31.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 277IWP holds 277 · IWR holds 806
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWP 100%·IWR 37%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWP
Every position in IWP is also held by IWR, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWP | IWR |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 24.4% | 18.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.2% | 10.8% |
| Information Technology | 15.6% | 13.0% |
| Health Care | 14.9% | 9.2% |
| Financials | 8.5% | 13.6% |
| Other Sectors | 15.3% | 34.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
| IWR | +2.9% | +18.1% | +23.0% | +16.4% | +8.5% | +11.6% | 1.12% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWP vs IWR →
Shared Holdings(277)
The top 10 shared positions account for 18% of the overlap, led by VRT, HWM and PWR.
3.43% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
3.32% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
2.25% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
2.51% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
2.49% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
2.33% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.50% | 0.55% | 0.50% | |
0.98% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.48% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
2.07% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
1.92% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.57% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.83% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.82% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.91% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.73% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.46% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.61% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.52% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.53% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.51% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.32% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.68% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.33% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.44% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
Showing the top 250 of 277 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWP and IWR overlap?
IWP and IWR overlap by 31.9% of portfolio weight. They share 277 holdings (IWP holds 277 positions and IWR holds 806), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWP and IWR?
The two portfolios are 31.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWP and IWR?
The largest positions held by both funds are VRT, HWM, PWR, RCL and HLT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 18% of the total overlap.
What does IWP own that IWR doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in IWP is also held by IWR. In the other direction, 529 positions (62.8% of IWR) are unique to IWR.