IWP vs IYC: Holdings Overlap
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
IYCiShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
iShares · 166 holdings · $1.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IWP: 2026-03-31, IYC: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWP and IYC?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277 positions; iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC, by iShares) holds 166. They have 71 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 71IWP holds 277 · IYC holds 166
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWP 25%·IYC 18%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWP
206 of 277 positions (74.4% of the fund) are not held by IYC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWP | IYC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.2% | 69.5% |
| Industrials | 24.4% | 5.2% |
| Information Technology | 15.6% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 14.9% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 4.9% | 14.0% |
| Other Sectors | 18.9% | 11.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
| IYC | +2.2% | +1.0% | +3.6% | +13.4% | +6.4% | +11.6% | 0.49% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWP vs IYC →
Shared Holdings(71)
The top 10 shared positions account for 46% of the overlap, led by HLT, RCL and CVNA.
2.49% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
2.51% | 1.09% | 1.09% | |
1.53% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
1.26% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
0.52% | 0.73% | 0.52% | |
0.50% | 1.18% | 0.50% | |
0.95% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.96% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.58% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 0.64% | 0.44% | |
0.89% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.87% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.77% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.33% | 0.50% | 0.33% | |
0.74% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.87% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.48% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.59% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.58% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.54% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.52% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.46% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.33% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.21% | 0.39% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWP and IYC overlap?
IWP and IYC overlap by 14.3% of portfolio weight. They share 71 holdings (IWP holds 277 positions and IYC holds 166), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWP and IYC?
The two portfolios are 14.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWP and IYC?
The largest positions held by both funds are HLT, RCL, CVNA, RBLX and YUM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 46% of the total overlap.
What does IWP own that IYC doesn't?
206 positions (74.4% of IWP) are unique to IWP, led by VRT, HWM and NET. In the other direction, 95 positions (82.0% of IYC) are unique to IYC.