IWP vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IWP: 2026-03-31, ONEQ: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWP and ONEQ?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 111 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 111IWP holds 277 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWP 33%·ONEQ 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWP
166 of 277 positions (67.3% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWP | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 15.6% | 53.0% |
| Industrials | 24.4% | 3.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.2% | 12.5% |
| Communication Services | 4.9% | 15.2% |
| Health Care | 14.9% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 18.9% | 9.7% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IWP, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWP vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(111)
The top 10 shared positions account for 32% of the overlap, led by DDOG, RKLB and MPWR.
1.33% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.13% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.82% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.50% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.25% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.13% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.51% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.57% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.61% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.14% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.44% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.51% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.16% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.34% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.29% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.60% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.95% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.15% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.88% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.19% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.07% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.13% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.90% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWP and ONEQ overlap?
IWP and ONEQ overlap by 4.4% of portfolio weight. They share 111 holdings (IWP holds 277 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWP and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 4.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWP and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are DDOG, RKLB, MPWR, ROST and HOOD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 32% of the total overlap.
What does IWP own that ONEQ doesn't?
166 positions (67.3% of IWP) are unique to IWP, led by VRT, HWM and RCL. In the other direction, 911 positions (95.0% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.