IWP vs SKYY: Holdings Overlap
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
SKYYFirst Trust Cloud Computing ETF
First Trust · 62 holdings · $3.1B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWP and SKYY?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277 positions; First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY, by First Trust) holds 62. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21IWP holds 277 · SKYY holds 62
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWP 9%·SKYY 29%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWP
256 of 277 positions (91.4% of the fund) are not held by SKYY. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in SKYY
41 of 62 positions (70.6% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWP | SKYY |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 15.6% | 82.6% |
| Industrials | 24.4% | 0.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.2% | 3.7% |
| Health Care | 14.9% | 0.6% |
| Communication Services | 4.9% | 8.7% |
| Other Sectors | 18.9% | 0.6% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 3.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IWP, 3% of SKYY).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
| SKYY | +12.3% | +20.1% | +27.6% | +25.7% | +8.0% | +17.1% | — |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWP vs SKYY →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the overlap, led by NET, DDOG and VEEV.
2.33% | 2.97% | 2.33% | |
1.33% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.75% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.57% | 3.41% | 0.57% | |
0.50% | 0.59% | 0.50% | |
0.45% | 1.71% | 0.45% | |
0.44% | 0.60% | 0.44% | |
0.36% | 0.59% | 0.36% | |
0.29% | 1.92% | 0.29% | |
0.26% | 0.65% | 0.26% | |
0.17% | 0.59% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.63% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 1.75% | 0.15% | |
0.12% | 0.55% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.60% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 1.53% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 1.93% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 1.51% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 3.69% | 0.09% | |
0.07% | 2.31% | 0.07% | |
0.04% | 0.56% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWP and SKYY overlap?
IWP and SKYY overlap by 7.7% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (IWP holds 277 positions and SKYY holds 62), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWP and SKYY?
The two portfolios are 7.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWP and SKYY?
The largest positions held by both funds are NET, DDOG, VEEV, P and ZS. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the total overlap.
What does IWP own that SKYY doesn't?
256 positions (91.4% of IWP) are unique to IWP, led by VRT, HWM and RCL. In the other direction, 41 positions (70.6% of SKYY) are unique to SKYY.