IWP vs VFLO: Holdings Overlap
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
VFLOVictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
VictoryShares · 50 holdings · $9.6B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWP and VFLO?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277 positions; VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO, by VictoryShares) holds 50. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14IWP holds 277 · VFLO holds 50
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWP 6%·VFLO 21%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWP
263 of 277 positions (93.8% of the fund) are not held by VFLO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWP | VFLO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 15.6% | 30.0% |
| Industrials | 24.4% | 10.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.2% | 17.9% |
| Health Care | 14.9% | 17.6% |
| Energy | 4.1% | 12.8% |
| Other Sectors | 19.7% | 11.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
| VFLO | +8.6% | +31.3% | +51.6% | +26.1% | — | — | 1.09% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWP vs VFLO →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the overlap, led by NRG, EXPE and VEEV.
1.08% | 1.67% | 1.08% | |
0.96% | 2.70% | 0.96% | |
0.75% | 1.13% | 0.75% | |
0.59% | 1.50% | 0.59% | |
0.52% | 1.42% | 0.52% | |
0.39% | 1.30% | 0.39% | |
0.34% | 1.29% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 1.72% | 0.33% | |
0.33% | 1.13% | 0.33% | |
0.29% | 1.78% | 0.29% | |
0.19% | 1.27% | 0.19% | |
0.14% | 2.22% | 0.14% | |
0.11% | 1.00% | 0.11% | |
0.04% | 1.12% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWP and VFLO overlap?
IWP and VFLO overlap by 6.1% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (IWP holds 277 positions and VFLO holds 50), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWP and VFLO?
The two portfolios are 6.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWP and VFLO?
The largest positions held by both funds are NRG, EXPE, VEEV, LVS and DECK. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the total overlap.
What does IWP own that VFLO doesn't?
263 positions (93.8% of IWP) are unique to IWP, led by VRT, HWM and RCL. In the other direction, 36 positions (78.3% of VFLO) are unique to VFLO.