IWP vs XLY: Holdings Overlap
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
XLYState Street® Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 47 holdings · $23.4B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IWP: 2026-03-31, XLY: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWP and XLY?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277 positions; State Street® Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLY, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 47. They have 17 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 17IWP holds 277 · XLY holds 47
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWP 13%·XLY 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWP
260 of 277 positions (86.6% of the fund) are not held by XLY. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWP | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.2% | 99.9% |
| Industrials | 24.4% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 15.6% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 14.9% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 8.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 15.3% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
| XLY | +2.1% | +0.8% | +8.1% | +12.3% | +6.7% | +12.6% | 0.75% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWP vs XLY →
Shared Holdings(17)
The top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the overlap, led by RCL, HLT and CVNA.
2.51% | 1.98% | 1.98% | |
2.49% | 1.81% | 1.81% | |
1.53% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
0.96% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
0.95% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
0.77% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.52% | 1.04% | 0.52% | |
0.50% | 2.02% | 0.50% | |
0.87% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.52% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.59% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.28% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.58% | 0.21% | |
0.12% | 0.27% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.72% | 0.11% | |
0.03% | 0.38% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWP and XLY overlap?
IWP and XLY overlap by 10.4% of portfolio weight. They share 17 holdings (IWP holds 277 positions and XLY holds 47), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWP and XLY?
The two portfolios are 10.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWP and XLY?
The largest positions held by both funds are RCL, HLT, CVNA, EXPE and TPR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the total overlap.
What does IWP own that XLY doesn't?
260 positions (86.6% of IWP) are unique to IWP, led by VRT, HWM and NET. In the other direction, 30 positions (86.0% of XLY) are unique to XLY.