IWP vs XRT: Holdings Overlap
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
XRTState Street® SPDR® S&P® Retail ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 75 holdings · $485M · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IWP: 2026-03-31, XRT: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWP and XRT?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P® Retail ETF (XRT, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 75. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14IWP holds 277 · XRT holds 75
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWP 6%·XRT 20%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWP
263 of 277 positions (93.9% of the fund) are not held by XRT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in XRT
61 of 75 positions (80.2% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWP | XRT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.2% | 79.2% |
| Industrials | 24.4% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 1.7% | 19.8% |
| Information Technology | 15.6% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 14.9% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 22.2% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 0.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IWP, 1% of XRT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
| XRT | +4.2% | +7.0% | +12.7% | +12.1% | +0.7% | +8.9% | 0.74% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWP vs XRT →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 94% of the overlap, led by CVNA, CPNG and TSCO.
1.53% | 1.34% | 1.34% | |
0.89% | 1.43% | 0.89% | |
0.87% | 1.46% | 0.87% | |
0.74% | 1.50% | 0.74% | |
0.50% | 1.45% | 0.50% | |
0.30% | 1.16% | 0.30% | |
0.27% | 1.32% | 0.27% | |
0.23% | 1.55% | 0.23% | |
0.21% | 1.51% | 0.21% | |
0.15% | 1.20% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 1.29% | 0.14% | |
0.10% | 1.58% | 0.10% | |
0.07% | 1.39% | 0.07% | |
0.02% | 1.62% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWP and XRT overlap?
IWP and XRT overlap by 5.8% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (IWP holds 277 positions and XRT holds 75), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWP and XRT?
The two portfolios are 5.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWP and XRT?
The largest positions held by both funds are CVNA, CPNG, TSCO, BURL and ROST. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 94% of the total overlap.
What does IWP own that XRT doesn't?
263 positions (93.9% of IWP) are unique to IWP, led by VRT, HWM and RCL. In the other direction, 61 positions (80.2% of XRT) are unique to XRT.