IWS vs IWR: Holdings Overlap
IWSiShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
iShares · 712 holdings · $15.9B · as of 2026-03-31
IWRiShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 806 holdings · $57.6B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWS and IWR?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS, by iShares) holds 712 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR, by iShares) holds 806. They have 712 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 80.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 80.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 712IWS holds 712 · IWR holds 806
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWS 100%·IWR 86%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWS
Every position in IWS is also held by IWR, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWS | IWR |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 17.1% | 18.7% |
| Financials | 15.1% | 13.6% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 13.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.8% | 10.8% |
| Health Care | 7.6% | 9.2% |
| Other Sectors | 39.6% | 34.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWS | +3.3% | +22.1% | +29.8% | +16.6% | +9.8% | +10.4% | 1.27% |
| IWR | +2.9% | +18.1% | +23.0% | +16.4% | +8.5% | +11.6% | 1.12% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWS vs IWR →
Shared Holdings(712)
The top 10 shared positions account for 8% of the overlap, led by GLW, WDC and SNDK.
1.08% | 0.84% | 0.84% | |
0.94% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.92% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
0.77% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.76% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.75% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
0.75% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.69% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.56% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.66% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.66% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.65% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.63% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.62% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.48% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.58% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.57% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.57% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.56% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.55% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.46% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.52% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.51% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.50% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.47% | 0.39% | 0.39% |
Showing the top 250 of 712 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWS and IWR overlap?
IWS and IWR overlap by 80.5% of portfolio weight. They share 712 holdings (IWS holds 712 positions and IWR holds 806), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWS and IWR?
The two portfolios are 80.5% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWS and IWR?
The largest positions held by both funds are GLW, WDC, SNDK, BNY and VLO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 8% of the total overlap.
What does IWS own that IWR doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in IWS is also held by IWR. In the other direction, 94 positions (13.9% of IWR) are unique to IWR.