IWS vs IYC: Holdings Overlap
IWSiShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
iShares · 712 holdings · $15.9B · as of 2026-03-31
IYCiShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
iShares · 166 holdings · $1.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IWS: 2026-03-31, IYC: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWS and IYC?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS, by iShares) holds 712 positions; iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC, by iShares) holds 166. They have 117 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 117IWS holds 712 · IYC holds 166
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWS 12%·IYC 24%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWS
595 of 712 positions (87.6% of the fund) are not held by IYC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWS | IYC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.8% | 69.5% |
| Industrials | 17.1% | 5.2% |
| Financials | 15.1% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 3.2% | 14.0% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 44.0% | 11.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWS | +3.3% | +22.1% | +29.8% | +16.6% | +9.8% | +10.4% | 1.27% |
| IYC | +2.2% | +1.0% | +3.6% | +13.4% | +6.4% | +11.6% | 0.49% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWS vs IYC →
Shared Holdings(117)
The top 10 shared positions account for 36% of the overlap, led by WBD, ROST and EA.
0.65% | 1.03% | 0.65% | |
0.56% | 1.18% | 0.56% | |
0.52% | 0.83% | 0.52% | |
0.46% | 0.77% | 0.46% | |
0.44% | 0.72% | 0.44% | |
0.42% | 0.76% | 0.42% | |
0.38% | 0.67% | 0.38% | |
0.36% | 0.65% | 0.36% | |
0.30% | 0.48% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 0.73% | 0.29% | |
0.26% | 0.42% | 0.26% | |
0.24% | 0.64% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.39% | 0.24% | |
0.23% | 0.39% | 0.23% | |
0.21% | 0.30% | 0.21% | |
0.21% | 0.50% | 0.21% | |
0.18% | 0.34% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.30% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.28% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.31% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.32% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.28% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.21% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.24% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWS and IYC overlap?
IWS and IYC overlap by 12.1% of portfolio weight. They share 117 holdings (IWS holds 712 positions and IYC holds 166), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWS and IYC?
The two portfolios are 12.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWS and IYC?
The largest positions held by both funds are WBD, ROST, EA, F and DAL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 36% of the total overlap.
What does IWS own that IYC doesn't?
595 positions (87.6% of IWS) are unique to IWS, led by GLW, WDC and SNDK. In the other direction, 49 positions (76.1% of IYC) are unique to IYC.