IWS vs JHMM: Holdings Overlap
IWSiShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
iShares · 712 holdings · $15.9B · as of 2026-03-31
JHMMJohn Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
John Hancock · 666 holdings · $6.0B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWS and JHMM?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS, by iShares) holds 712 positions; John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM, by John Hancock) holds 666. They have 496 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 63.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 63.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 496IWS holds 712 · JHMM holds 666
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWS 71%·JHMM 83%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWS
216 of 712 positions (29.2% of the fund) are not held by JHMM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in JHMM
170 of 666 positions (16.8% of the fund) are not held by IWS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWS | JHMM |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 17.1% | 20.0% |
| Financials | 15.1% | 15.5% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 13.9% |
| Health Care | 7.6% | 10.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.8% | 9.8% |
| Other Sectors | 39.6% | 29.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWS | +3.3% | +22.1% | +29.8% | +16.6% | +9.8% | +10.4% | 1.27% |
| JHMM | +3.3% | +17.3% | +24.7% | +15.8% | +8.8% | +11.9% | 0.86% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWS vs JHMM →
Shared Holdings(496)
The top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the overlap, led by KEYS, ETR and CIEN.
0.49% | 0.52% | 0.49% | |
0.51% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.56% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.50% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.47% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.42% | 0.44% | 0.42% | |
0.43% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.42% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.43% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.39% | 0.47% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.47% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.40% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 0.45% | 0.34% | |
0.36% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.32% | 0.36% | 0.32% | |
0.32% | 0.34% | 0.32% | |
0.32% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.38% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.43% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.34% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.39% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.31% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.29% | 0.30% | 0.29% |
Showing the top 250 of 496 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWS and JHMM overlap?
IWS and JHMM overlap by 63.6% of portfolio weight. They share 496 holdings (IWS holds 712 positions and JHMM holds 666), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWS and JHMM?
The two portfolios are 63.6% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWS and JHMM?
The largest positions held by both funds are KEYS, ETR, CIEN, AME and TER. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 7% of the total overlap.
What does IWS own that JHMM doesn't?
216 positions (29.2% of IWS) are unique to IWS, led by GLW, WDC and SNDK. In the other direction, 170 positions (16.8% of JHMM) are unique to JHMM.