IWS vs VOT: Holdings Overlap
IWSiShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
iShares · 712 holdings · $15.9B · as of 2026-03-31
VOTVanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund
Vanguard · 130 holdings · $19.9B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWS and VOT?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS, by iShares) holds 712 positions; Vanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund (VOT, by Vanguard) holds 130. They have 69 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 17.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 17.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 69IWS holds 712 · VOT holds 130
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWS 18%·VOT 49%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWS
643 of 712 positions (81.3% of the fund) are not held by VOT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in VOT
61 of 130 positions (51.2% of the fund) are not held by IWS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWS | VOT |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 17.1% | 25.1% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 22.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.8% | 15.2% |
| Financials | 15.1% | 8.5% |
| Health Care | 7.6% | 10.5% |
| Other Sectors | 39.6% | 18.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWS | +3.3% | +22.1% | +29.8% | +16.6% | +9.8% | +10.4% | 1.27% |
| VOT | +1.9% | +10.1% | +7.1% | +14.7% | +5.4% | +11.9% | 0.59% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWS vs VOT →
Shared Holdings(69)
The top 10 shared positions account for 32% of the overlap, led by WDC, GLW and O.
0.94% | 1.19% | 0.94% | |
1.08% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.57% | 1.48% | 0.57% | |
0.56% | 1.82% | 0.56% | |
0.56% | 0.71% | 0.56% | |
0.52% | 0.66% | 0.52% | |
0.50% | 1.28% | 0.50% | |
0.47% | 1.21% | 0.47% | |
0.47% | 0.65% | 0.47% | |
0.46% | 1.42% | 0.46% | |
0.42% | 0.58% | 0.42% | |
0.39% | 0.52% | 0.39% | |
0.39% | 1.01% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.99% | 0.38% | |
0.38% | 0.52% | 0.38% | |
0.37% | 0.92% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.92% | 0.36% | |
0.36% | 0.96% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.91% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 0.95% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.84% | 0.33% | |
0.32% | 0.41% | 0.32% | |
0.30% | 0.75% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.76% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 1.12% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWS and VOT overlap?
IWS and VOT overlap by 17.9% of portfolio weight. They share 69 holdings (IWS holds 712 positions and VOT holds 130), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWS and VOT?
The two portfolios are 17.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWS and VOT?
The largest positions held by both funds are WDC, GLW, O, ROST and CIEN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 32% of the total overlap.
What does IWS own that VOT doesn't?
643 positions (81.3% of IWS) are unique to IWS, led by SNDK, BNY and VLO. In the other direction, 61 positions (51.2% of VOT) are unique to VOT.