IWX vs MGV: Holdings Overlap
IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
iShares · 154 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
MGVVanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund
Vanguard · 120 holdings · $13.6B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IWX: 2026-03-31, MGV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWX and MGV?
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX, by iShares) holds 154 positions; Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund (MGV, by Vanguard) holds 120. They have 108 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 74.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 74.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 108IWX holds 154 · MGV holds 120
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWX 81%·MGV 90%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWX
46 of 154 positions (18.8% of the fund) are not held by MGV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWX | MGV |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 22.3% | 21.6% |
| Information Technology | 11.4% | 18.0% |
| Health Care | 13.6% | 15.9% |
| Industrials | 11.6% | 13.6% |
| Consumer Staples | 8.5% | 11.0% |
| Other Sectors | 32.4% | 18.3% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 1.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IWX, 1% of MGV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWX | +4.2% | +23.5% | +36.3% | +20.0% | +12.9% | +12.2% | 1.36% |
| MGV | +1.6% | +19.3% | +30.6% | +18.7% | +13.1% | +13.0% | 1.83% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWX vs MGV →
Shared Holdings(108)
The top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the overlap, led by JPM, BRK-B and XOM.
3.89% | 3.64% | 3.64% | |
4.30% | 3.15% | 3.15% | |
3.49% | 2.91% | 2.91% | |
2.86% | 2.61% | 2.61% | |
2.37% | 2.44% | 2.37% | |
1.84% | 5.26% | 1.84% | |
1.88% | 1.66% | 1.66% | |
1.65% | 1.60% | 1.60% | |
1.50% | 2.06% | 1.50% | |
1.43% | 1.60% | 1.43% | |
1.45% | 1.41% | 1.41% | |
1.40% | 1.96% | 1.40% | |
1.25% | 1.33% | 1.25% | |
1.20% | 1.66% | 1.20% | |
1.25% | 1.16% | 1.16% | |
1.20% | 1.15% | 1.15% | |
1.14% | 1.39% | 1.14% | |
1.13% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
1.10% | 1.34% | 1.10% | |
0.95% | 2.20% | 0.95% | |
0.94% | 1.72% | 0.94% | |
0.91% | 1.19% | 0.91% | |
0.89% | 0.95% | 0.89% | |
0.90% | 0.88% | 0.88% | |
1.03% | 0.87% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWX and MGV overlap?
IWX and MGV overlap by 74.0% of portfolio weight. They share 108 holdings (IWX holds 154 positions and MGV holds 120), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWX and MGV?
The two portfolios are 74.0% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWX and MGV?
The largest positions held by both funds are JPM, BRK-B, XOM, JNJ and WMT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the total overlap.
What does IWX own that MGV doesn't?
46 positions (18.8% of IWX) are unique to IWX, led by GOOGL, AMZN and GOOG. In the other direction, 12 positions (9.2% of MGV) are unique to MGV.