IWX vs SCHV: Holdings Overlap
IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
iShares · 154 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
SCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Schwab · 555 holdings · $16.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IWX: 2026-03-31, SCHV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWX and SCHV?
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX, by iShares) holds 154 positions; Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV, by Schwab) holds 555. They have 118 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 57.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 57.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 118IWX holds 154 · SCHV holds 555
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWX 79%·SCHV 63%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWX
36 of 154 positions (21.0% of the fund) are not held by SCHV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWX | SCHV |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 22.3% | 18.9% |
| Information Technology | 11.4% | 21.3% |
| Industrials | 11.6% | 14.0% |
| Health Care | 13.6% | 10.8% |
| Communication Services | 10.2% | 2.4% |
| Other Sectors | 30.8% | 32.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWX | +4.2% | +23.5% | +36.3% | +20.0% | +12.9% | +12.2% | 1.36% |
| SCHV | +1.5% | +18.8% | +27.7% | +17.6% | +10.9% | +11.4% | 1.75% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWX vs SCHV →
Shared Holdings(118)
The top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the overlap, led by BRK-B, JPM and XOM.
4.30% | 2.82% | 2.82% | |
3.89% | 2.62% | 2.62% | |
3.49% | 1.97% | 1.97% | |
1.84% | 3.54% | 1.84% | |
2.86% | 1.76% | 1.76% | |
2.37% | 1.65% | 1.65% | |
1.50% | 1.54% | 1.50% | |
1.40% | 1.32% | 1.32% | |
1.43% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
1.88% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
1.65% | 1.08% | 1.08% | |
1.14% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
1.45% | 0.96% | 0.96% | |
0.95% | 1.75% | 0.95% | |
0.94% | 1.16% | 0.94% | |
1.10% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
1.25% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
0.91% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
1.25% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
1.20% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
0.74% | 0.99% | 0.74% | |
0.79% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
0.76% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
1.03% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
1.02% | 0.64% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWX and SCHV overlap?
IWX and SCHV overlap by 57.4% of portfolio weight. They share 118 holdings (IWX holds 154 positions and SCHV holds 555), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWX and SCHV?
The two portfolios are 57.4% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWX and SCHV?
The largest positions held by both funds are BRK-B, JPM, XOM, MU and JNJ. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the total overlap.
What does IWX own that SCHV doesn't?
36 positions (21.0% of IWX) are unique to IWX, led by GOOGL, AMZN and GOOG. In the other direction, 437 positions (36.5% of SCHV) are unique to SCHV.