IXC vs FNDF: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 60 holdings · $2.8B · as of 2026-03-31
FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Schwab · 888 holdings · $25.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IXC: 2026-03-31, FNDF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IXC and FNDF?
iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC, by iShares) holds 60 positions; Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF, by Schwab) holds 888. They have 24 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 24IXC holds 60 · FNDF holds 888
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IXC 36%·FNDF 10%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IXC
36 of 60 positions (64.2% of the fund) are not held by FNDF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IXC | FNDF |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 99.6% | 10.0% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.8% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 12.3% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 11.4% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 0.2% | 27.2% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 13.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IXC, 13% of FNDF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXC | +5.9% | +29.6% | +39.8% | +15.2% | +21.2% | +9.8% | 2.93% |
| FNDF | +4.2% | +22.8% | +39.1% | +23.1% | +14.5% | +12.0% | 2.97% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IXC vs FNDF →
Shared Holdings(24)
The top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the overlap, led by SHEL, TTE and BP-.
7.00% | 2.19% | 2.19% | |
4.96% | 1.69% | 1.69% | |
3.27% | 1.08% | 1.08% | |
1.57% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
2.09% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
2.70% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.96% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.83% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
3.15% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.96% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.64% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.20% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.73% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.37% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.72% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.28% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.52% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.69% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.47% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.30% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.14% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.27% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.47% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.26% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IXC and FNDF overlap?
IXC and FNDF overlap by 9.7% of portfolio weight. They share 24 holdings (IXC holds 60 positions and FNDF holds 888), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IXC and FNDF?
The two portfolios are 9.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IXC and FNDF?
The largest positions held by both funds are SHEL, TTE, BP-, ENI and SU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the total overlap.
What does IXC own that FNDF doesn't?
36 positions (64.2% of IXC) are unique to IXC, led by XOM, CVX and COP. In the other direction, 864 positions (89.6% of FNDF) are unique to FNDF.