IXG vs EFV: Holdings Overlap
IXGiShares Global Financials ETF
iShares · 235 holdings · $699M · as of 2026-03-31
EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
iShares · 419 holdings · $29.6B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IXG: 2026-03-31, EFV: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IXG and EFV?
iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG, by iShares) holds 235 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV, by iShares) holds 419. They have 98 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 28.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 28.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 98IXG holds 235 · EFV holds 419
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IXG 32%·EFV 35%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IXG
137 of 235 positions (67.6% of the fund) are not held by EFV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IXG | EFV |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 99.3% | 35.7% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 9.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 8.4% |
| Energy | 0.0% | 7.3% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 7.1% |
| Other Sectors | 0.2% | 26.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 4.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IXG, 5% of EFV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXG | +4.2% | +13.1% | +23.8% | +25.1% | +14.4% | +13.3% | 2.10% |
| EFV | +5.3% | +18.3% | +32.4% | +23.4% | +14.6% | +10.7% | 4.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IXG vs EFV →
Shared Holdings(98)
The top 10 shared positions account for 37% of the overlap, led by HSBA, 8306 and SAN.
2.05% | 2.77% | 2.05% | |
1.48% | 1.77% | 1.48% | |
1.20% | 1.57% | 1.20% | |
1.17% | 1.52% | 1.17% | |
0.92% | 1.13% | 0.92% | |
0.90% | 1.10% | 0.90% | |
0.79% | 0.89% | 0.79% | |
0.73% | 0.94% | 0.73% | |
0.69% | 0.92% | 0.69% | |
0.69% | 0.84% | 0.69% | |
0.68% | 0.83% | 0.68% | |
0.65% | 0.78% | 0.65% | |
1.43% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.82% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
0.60% | 0.68% | 0.60% | |
0.55% | 0.71% | 0.55% | |
0.55% | 0.70% | 0.55% | |
0.53% | 0.71% | 0.53% | |
0.52% | 0.74% | 0.52% | |
0.50% | 0.65% | 0.50% | |
0.50% | 0.52% | 0.50% | |
0.53% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.43% | 0.56% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 0.51% | 0.43% | |
0.36% | 0.42% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IXG and EFV overlap?
IXG and EFV overlap by 28.8% of portfolio weight. They share 98 holdings (IXG holds 235 positions and EFV holds 419), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IXG and EFV?
The two portfolios are 28.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IXG and EFV?
The largest positions held by both funds are HSBA, 8306, SAN, ALV and 8316. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 37% of the total overlap.
What does IXG own that EFV doesn't?
137 positions (67.6% of IXG) are unique to IXG, led by BRK-B, JPM and V. In the other direction, 321 positions (64.1% of EFV) are unique to EFV.