IXG vs SCHF: Holdings Overlap
IXGiShares Global Financials ETF
iShares · 235 holdings · $699M · as of 2026-03-31
SCHFSchwab International Equity ETF
Schwab · 1476 holdings · $67.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IXG: 2026-03-31, SCHF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IXG and SCHF?
iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG, by iShares) holds 235 positions; Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF, by Schwab) holds 1476. They have 120 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 21.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 21.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 120IXG holds 235 · SCHF holds 1476
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IXG 43%·SCHF 21%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IXG
115 of 235 positions (56.4% of the fund) are not held by SCHF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IXG | SCHF |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 99.3% | 21.7% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 14.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 7.1% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 6.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.2% | 22.6% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 11.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IXG, 12% of SCHF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXG | +4.2% | +13.1% | +23.8% | +25.1% | +14.4% | +13.3% | 2.10% |
| SCHF | +2.7% | +18.1% | +30.6% | +20.0% | +10.5% | +10.4% | 2.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IXG vs SCHF →
Shared Holdings(120)
The top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the overlap, led by HSBA, RY and 8306.
2.05% | 1.08% | 1.08% | |
1.65% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
1.48% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
1.43% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
1.14% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
1.20% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
1.17% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
0.86% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.90% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.92% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.82% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.70% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.85% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.73% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.69% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.79% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.68% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.64% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.62% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.65% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.65% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.52% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.69% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.53% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.65% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IXG and SCHF overlap?
IXG and SCHF overlap by 21.2% of portfolio weight. They share 120 holdings (IXG holds 235 positions and SCHF holds 1476), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IXG and SCHF?
The two portfolios are 21.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IXG and SCHF?
The largest positions held by both funds are HSBA, RY, 8306, CBA and TD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the total overlap.
What does IXG own that SCHF doesn't?
115 positions (56.4% of IXG) are unique to IXG, led by BRK-B, JPM and V. In the other direction, 1356 positions (78.2% of SCHF) are unique to SCHF.