IXJ vs MCHI: Holdings Overlap
IXJiShares Global Healthcare ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-03-31
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IXJ: 2026-03-31, MCHI: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IXJ and MCHI?
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ, by iShares) holds 123 positions; iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3IXJ holds 123 · MCHI holds 580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IXJ 0%·MCHI 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IXJ
120 of 123 positions (99.3% of the fund) are not held by MCHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MCHI
577 of 580 positions (98.6% of the fund) are not held by IXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IXJ | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 98.9% | 0.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 21.1% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 17.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 14.8% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 7.8% |
| Other Sectors | 0.6% | 9.2% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 28.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IXJ, 29% of MCHI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXJ | +0.7% | +5.9% | +25.5% | +7.8% | +4.8% | +8.5% | 1.41% |
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IXJ vs MCHI →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by IJ0, HONG KONG DOLLAR and Euro.
 IJ0BeOne Medicines Ltd | 0.28% | 0.74% | 0.28% |
|---|---|---|---|
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.20% | 0.00% |
| Euro | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IXJ and MCHI overlap?
IXJ and MCHI overlap by 0.3% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (IXJ holds 123 positions and MCHI holds 580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IXJ and MCHI?
The two portfolios are 0.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IXJ and MCHI?
The largest positions held by both funds are IJ0, HONG KONG DOLLAR and Euro. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does IXJ own that MCHI doesn't?
120 positions (99.3% of IXJ) are unique to IXJ, led by LLY, JNJ and ABBV. In the other direction, 577 positions (98.6% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI.