IXJ vs SCHF: Holdings Overlap
IXJiShares Global Healthcare ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-03-31
SCHFSchwab International Equity ETF
Schwab · 1476 holdings · $67.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IXJ: 2026-03-31, SCHF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IXJ and SCHF?
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ, by iShares) holds 123 positions; Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF, by Schwab) holds 1476. They have 50 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 50IXJ holds 123 · SCHF holds 1476
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IXJ 29%·SCHF 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IXJ
73 of 123 positions (70.3% of the fund) are not held by SCHF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IXJ | SCHF |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 98.9% | 7.1% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 21.7% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 14.5% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 6.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.7% | 22.6% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 11.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IXJ, 12% of SCHF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXJ | +0.7% | +5.9% | +25.5% | +7.8% | +4.8% | +8.5% | 1.41% |
| SCHF | +2.7% | +18.1% | +30.6% | +20.0% | +10.5% | +10.4% | 2.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IXJ vs SCHF →
Shared Holdings(50)
The top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the overlap, led by ROP, NOVN and AZN.
3.72% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
3.87% | 0.97% | 0.97% | |
4.02% | 0.93% | 0.93% | |
1.55% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
1.49% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.37% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.90% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.78% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.60% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.78% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.60% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.60% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.58% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.48% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.48% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.46% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.63% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.50% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.49% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.47% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.45% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.39% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.26% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.28% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.22% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IXJ and SCHF overlap?
IXJ and SCHF overlap by 7.2% of portfolio weight. They share 50 holdings (IXJ holds 123 positions and SCHF holds 1476), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IXJ and SCHF?
The two portfolios are 7.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IXJ and SCHF?
The largest positions held by both funds are ROP, NOVN, AZN, NOVOB and GSK. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the total overlap.
What does IXJ own that SCHF doesn't?
73 positions (70.3% of IXJ) are unique to IXJ, led by LLY, JNJ and ABBV. In the other direction, 1426 positions (92.1% of SCHF) are unique to SCHF.