IXN vs ACWI: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 137 holdings · $8.8B · as of 2026-03-31
iShares · 2308 holdings · $33.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IXN: 2026-03-31, ACWI: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IXN and ACWI?
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN, by iShares) holds 137 positions; iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI, by iShares) holds 2308. They have 129 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 27.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 27.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 129IXN holds 137 · ACWI holds 2308
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IXN 99%·ACWI 27%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IXN
8 of 137 positions (0.8% of the fund) are not held by ACWI.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IXN | ACWI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 99.1% | 28.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 10.3% |
| Communication Services | 0.6% | 8.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 8.7% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 24.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 4.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IXN, 4% of ACWI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXN | +3.7% | +34.3% | +47.4% | +33.2% | +19.9% | +24.0% | 0.78% |
| ACWI | +3.2% | +14.8% | +25.0% | +20.4% | +11.3% | +12.8% | 1.39% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IXN vs ACWI →
Shared Holdings(129)
The top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
13.97% | 4.88% | 4.88% | |
12.28% | 4.01% | 4.01% | |
9.06% | 2.90% | 2.90% | |
4.84% | 1.89% | 1.89% | |
4.60% | 1.73% | 1.73% | |
3.39% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
2.21% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.93% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
3.01% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.80% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
1.21% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.79% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.55% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.95% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
1.58% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
1.45% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.03% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.12% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.32% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.91% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.80% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.74% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.90% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.01% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.02% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IXN and ACWI overlap?
IXN and ACWI overlap by 27.0% of portfolio weight. They share 129 holdings (IXN holds 137 positions and ACWI holds 2308), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IXN and ACWI?
The two portfolios are 27.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IXN and ACWI?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO and TSMWF. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the total overlap.
What does IXN own that ACWI doesn't?
8 positions (0.8% of IXN) are unique to IXN, led by SNDK, AKAM and SWKS. In the other direction, 2179 positions (72.7% of ACWI) are unique to ACWI.