IYC vs JQUA: Holdings Overlap
IYCiShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
iShares · 166 holdings · $1.2B · as of 2026-04-30
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
JPMorgan · 289 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are IYC and JQUA?
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC, by iShares) holds 166 positions; JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA, by JPMorgan) holds 289. They have 48 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 48IYC holds 166 · JQUA holds 289
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IYC 42%·JQUA 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IYC
118 of 166 positions (58.1% of the fund) are not held by JQUA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IYC | JQUA |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 69.5% | 9.6% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 37.8% |
| Communication Services | 14.0% | 6.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Consumer Staples | 11.1% | 5.6% |
| Other Sectors | 5.2% | 27.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYC | +2.2% | +1.0% | +3.6% | +13.4% | +6.4% | +11.6% | 0.49% |
| JQUA | +3.6% | +18.6% | +24.4% | +19.8% | +13.4% | — | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IYC vs JQUA →
Shared Holdings(48)
The top 10 shared positions account for 52% of the overlap, led by COST, HD and MCD.
4.26% | 1.44% | 1.44% | |
3.90% | 1.09% | 1.09% | |
3.42% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
2.86% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
1.95% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
2.23% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
1.31% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
1.37% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.18% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.21% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.76% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.83% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.73% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
4.58% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.96% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.12% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.85% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.34% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.38% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.22% | 0.23% | 0.22% | |
0.27% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.47% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.48% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.23% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IYC and JQUA overlap?
IYC and JQUA overlap by 12.5% of portfolio weight. They share 48 holdings (IYC holds 166 positions and JQUA holds 289), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IYC and JQUA?
The two portfolios are 12.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IYC and JQUA?
The largest positions held by both funds are COST, HD, MCD, TJX and SBUX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 52% of the total overlap.
What does IYC own that JQUA doesn't?
118 positions (58.1% of IYC) are unique to IYC, led by AMZN, TSLA and NFLX. In the other direction, 241 positions (86.7% of JQUA) are unique to JQUA.