IYW vs QTEC: Holdings Overlap
IYWiShares U.S. Technology ETF
iShares · 139 holdings · $25.2B · as of 2026-04-30
QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
First Trust · 45 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IYW: 2026-04-30, QTEC: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IYW and QTEC?
iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW, by iShares) holds 139 positions; First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC, by First Trust) holds 45. They have 38 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 40.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 40.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 38IYW holds 139 · QTEC holds 45
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IYW 84%·QTEC 83%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IYW
101 of 139 positions (15.7% of the fund) are not held by QTEC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IYW | QTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 80.4% | 86.5% |
| Communication Services | 17.9% | 6.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.4% | 4.7% |
| Industrials | 1.0% | 2.2% |
| Financials | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | +4.4% | +27.3% | +39.7% | +32.8% | +19.8% | +24.9% | 0.10% |
| QTEC | +1.7% | +37.5% | +49.6% | +28.1% | +14.1% | +21.4% | 0.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IYW vs QTEC →
Shared Holdings(38)
The top 10 shared positions account for 54% of the overlap, led by AAPL, AMD and NVDA.
13.63% | 2.37% | 2.37% | |
3.50% | 2.34% | 2.34% | |
16.23% | 2.34% | 2.34% | |
2.56% | 2.33% | 2.33% | |
3.78% | 2.31% | 2.31% | |
3.99% | 2.24% | 2.24% | |
2.80% | 2.23% | 2.23% | |
1.98% | 2.17% | 1.98% | |
1.92% | 2.22% | 1.92% | |
1.86% | 2.25% | 1.86% | |
2.98% | 1.85% | 1.85% | |
1.57% | 2.40% | 1.57% | |
1.41% | 2.27% | 1.41% | |
1.21% | 2.38% | 1.21% | |
1.18% | 2.30% | 1.18% | |
6.33% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
7.84% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
0.91% | 2.14% | 0.91% | |
0.88% | 2.28% | 0.88% | |
0.86% | 2.61% | 0.86% | |
0.68% | 2.21% | 0.68% | |
0.65% | 2.08% | 0.65% | |
0.65% | 2.20% | 0.65% | |
0.62% | 2.27% | 0.62% | |
0.56% | 2.18% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IYW and QTEC overlap?
IYW and QTEC overlap by 40.8% of portfolio weight. They share 38 holdings (IYW holds 139 positions and QTEC holds 45), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IYW and QTEC?
The two portfolios are 40.8% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IYW and QTEC?
The largest positions held by both funds are AAPL, AMD, NVDA, INTC and AVGO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 54% of the total overlap.
What does IYW own that QTEC doesn't?
101 positions (15.7% of IYW) are unique to IYW, led by ORCL, IBM and APH. In the other direction, 7 positions (16.6% of QTEC) are unique to QTEC.