JGLO vs IXN: Holdings Overlap
JGLOJPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
JPMorgan · 75 holdings · $6.8B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 137 holdings · $8.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (JGLO: 2026-04-30, IXN: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are JGLO and IXN?
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO, by JPMorgan) holds 75 positions; iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN, by iShares) holds 137. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 24.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 24.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12JGLO holds 75 · IXN holds 137
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- JGLO 26%·IXN 56%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in JGLO
63 of 75 positions (73.5% of the fund) are not held by IXN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IXN
125 of 137 positions (43.8% of the fund) are not held by JGLO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | JGLO | IXN |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 27.3% | 99.1% |
| Financials | 19.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 15.5% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 8.5% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 8.3% | 0.6% |
| Other Sectors | 20.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JGLO | +4.0% | +10.0% | +15.2% | — | — | — | 1.09% |
| IXN | +3.7% | +34.3% | +47.4% | +33.2% | +19.9% | +24.0% | 0.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in JGLO vs IXN →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 98% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and AVGO.
7.99% | 13.97% | 7.99% | |
4.16% | 9.06% | 4.16% | |
3.50% | 4.84% | 3.50% | |
3.04% | 12.28% | 3.04% | |
1.63% | 3.01% | 1.63% | |
1.02% | 2.21% | 1.02% | |
1.15% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
0.73% | 4.60% | 0.73% | |
0.60% | 3.39% | 0.60% | |
1.26% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.26% | 0.64% | 0.26% | |
0.21% | 0.71% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do JGLO and IXN overlap?
JGLO and IXN overlap by 24.4% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (JGLO holds 75 positions and IXN holds 137), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both JGLO and IXN?
The two portfolios are 24.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of JGLO and IXN?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, AVGO, AAPL and ASML. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 98% of the total overlap.
What does JGLO own that IXN doesn't?
63 positions (73.5% of JGLO) are unique to JGLO, led by AMZN, MA and META. In the other direction, 125 positions (43.8% of IXN) are unique to IXN.